Manchester United Seeks Exciting Play Under Carrick’s Vision This Season
Michael Carrick expressed his desire for Manchester United to prioritize winning games while embracing an exciting style of football for the upcoming season. In a recent statement, Carrick emphasized the need to entertain fans, echoing the legendary Sir Alex Ferguson’s belief that teams have a duty to provide entertainment on the pitch.
As fans and analysts frequently reference ‘United DNA’ in discussions about the club, Carrick aims to revive a system that pays homage to the club’s traditions, especially after previous managers’ attempts to shift towards a slower, possession-oriented style. With the Premier League kickoff against Hull City approaching this Saturday at 12:30 BST, Carrick’s tactical approach during pre-season offers insight into his vision for the team.
In terms of building play, Carrick has emphasized a transition away from lengthy goal-kicks towards more short passes. Drawing on former manager Ruben Amorim’s management, which encouraged long plays to combat tight pressures, Carrick has shifted the focus back to embracing risks. His preferred shape during these goal-kicks features a 4-2-4 formation, promoting fluid movement among the front four while maintaining structured positions among the defenders and midfielders.
Overall, United’s pre-season preparations have shown promise, particularly in their play from the back, with Carrick instilling a mindset that encourages dynamic collaboration among players. He emphasizes creating clusters of three as they work to create space against defensive lines, often looking for timely third-man runs.
Additionally, United has made key acquisitions, including technical midfielders like Andrey Santos, Youri Tielemans, and Mason Mount. Their integration has aided the team’s progression upfield, complementing Kobbie Mainoo’s return to action. While the change in player roles offers opportunities, Carrick acknowledges the balance between risk and control is crucial, as seen during their pre-season match against AC Milan.
In their out-of-possession strategy, Carrick has re-established a high-pressing game, again relying on the 4-2-4 formation. This approach keeps the attack compact and prepared for rapid counter-attacks, aiming to generate scoring opportunities through intense pressing.
However, challenges from opponents like AC Milan demonstrated potential vulnerabilities in this tactical setup. Milan’s adeptness at exploiting space between United’s narrow front four highlighted the need for strategic adaptability. As teams interpret Carrick’s style, he must remain responsive to evolving tactics in the Premier League.
Looking ahead, the narrative of the season seems anchored in Manchester United’s challenge to balance dynamic play with effective ball control, a dual objective that past managerial tenures encountered while aspiring to elevate the team’s performance.
“First and foremost, we want to win,” said Michael Carrick when asked what style of football he wanted his Manchester United team to play this season.
But he quickly clarified, “we want to be excited – that’s why we love this club. I’m fully aware that we need to do it in a certain way”.
Advertisement
Carrick echoed the sentiment of the architect of United’s most successful era, Sir Alex Ferguson, who in 2017 said: “I think you have a duty to entertain. We have to always remember there’s a public to be entertained.”
‘United DNA’ has often been referenced when fans, ex-players and pundits have discussed the club in recent years.
And after failed attempts from managers to mould the team into a slower, more measured, possession-heavy side, Carrick is aiming to create a style and system that mirrors United’s traditions.
Before the Red Devils kick off their Premier League season at Hull City this Saturday (12:30 BST) what have we learned from how Carrick has approached pre-season tactically?
Advertisement
Balancing fast attacks with controlled possession
Beginning with the shape of United’s squad provides much-needed context, but it is important to note that much of their play is based on tactical principles, not just formations.
In build-up play, United have looked to play short.
Former manager Ruben Amorim’s solution to the increase in man-to-man pressure across the Premier League was to encourage goalkeeper Senne Lammens to play long. This was to avoid the risk associated with short passing – something he tried to mixed results early in his tenure.
Carrick has instead looked to revert United’s mindset here, asking them to take that risk again.
Advertisement
The shape his team have used from goal-kicks has been a 4-2-4 with Lammens between the two central defenders. The front four play in a very fluid manner with the four defenders and two central midfielders taking up more consistent positions behind them.
Here we see how United set up when building out from the back. The goalkeeper is involved, positioned in the middle of the back four and behind a narrow midfield two. The front four take up fluid positions, rotating between themselves and making runs off the ball. [BBC]
Overall, building out from the back has been a promising part of United’s game in pre-season and where we have most clearly seen some of the principles Carrick has tried to instil in his squad.
Going back to Amorim’s United once more, when they did play out from the back, they would execute pre-planned passing routines.
Carrick’s United instead look to escape pressure through trios of players passing the ball between each other in a less choreographed manner.
Advertisement
Pre-season coaching has reinforced the players’ understanding around supporting team-mates to create clusters of threes.
Which three players converge differs throughout the game and the players are given a level of personal responsibility to interpret the match during it.
More specifically, a collective principle being taught to the players is to look to make third-man runs – often off the back of their marker – to receive the ball with time and space.
Once United have broken the opposition’s initial pressure in the described manner, they often find themselves in open space with pacy attackers ahead of them ready to attack in a more direct fashion.
Advertisement
The signings of technical, deep-lying midfielders aid these overarching concepts.
Andrey Santos, Youri Tielemans and Mason Mount in particular have combined well to help United get up the pitch. This style of play suits the strengths of Kobbie Mainoo too, who returned to action with a cameo in Saturday’s 4-2 defeat by AC Milan.
The increased responsibility players have to interpret the game has benefits and trade-offs as with all tactical approaches.
Against Milan, we saw the introduction of arguably United’s best player last season, Bruno Fernandes. Alongside Tielemans and Santos, the midfield trio struggled to build up and create a solid platform upon which United could dominate the ball.
Advertisement
The natural instincts of these players in the conditions of the game resulted in a United side that looked to play forward too often and too early – resulting in turnovers and a lack of control.
Carrick wants United to maximise the quality of their fast attackers by playing more vertically – pleased when his side transition from their half into the opponent’s with as few passes as necessary, while also hoping United do not lose the ball carelessly.
United’s high-risk, high-reward pressing
Out of possession, United have looked to press high. Starting in a 4-2-4 formation again, players hold their positions before springing to press certain opponents when the moment is right.
Advertisement
We have established that Carrick is keen to embrace United’s front-footed DNA, looking to be proactive in their set-up this season rather than giving the opponent too much respect by sitting deep. Their defensive tactics feed into this.
The 4-2-4 leaves four attackers high and narrow. This is for a number of reasons. First, defending in this way blocks the centre of the pitch making it difficult for opponents to find players through the middle. Generally coaches, including Carrick, are more willing to concede possession in wide areas, considering the middle of the pitch more dangerous.
Here we see Manchester United’s 4-2-4 defensive shape. The central attackers look to prevent Leeds’ holding midfielders from getting on the ball. [BBC]
Secondly, the front four are positioned with United’s counter-attack in mind. If United are able to win the ball back, they can quickly find four attackers closer to goal against fewer defenders. Their press becomes a method of chance creation.
Advertisement
This paid dividends in the 1-1 draw against Paris St-Germain, resulting in their equaliser. After winning the ball, United found themselves four against four in PSG’s final third, before Bryan Mbeumo scored.
AC Milan’s win against United, however, may have provided clues as to how teams might counteract Carrick’s defensive set-up – notably with the use of a 5-2-3 formation.
United’s two central attackers would look to block passes into Milan’s midfield two before pressing the defenders.
Milan’s wing-backs would drop very deep, making it easy for the central defenders to find them around United’s narrow front four.
Advertisement
This required United’s full-back to cover a large distance to close down the wing-back on the ball. By the time pressure was applied, the ball had already been moved on.
With how fast the tactical landscape changes in the Premier League, Carrick will have to be nimble in how his side defends against such solutions.
Milan’s back three would drop deep, baiting United’s front four to step up and press them. This was the cue for Milan’s wingbacks to drop deep, increasing the distance United’s full-backs had to cover to apply pressure. [BBC]
Looking at both the tactics Carrick has used in pre-season and the signings United have made, the story of the season will likely revolve around the difficult task of moving away from relying solely on the counter-attack, something they used so effectively towards the end of last season.
Advertisement
After starting brightly, Erik ten Hag and Ole Gunnar Solskjaer stumbled when they looked to bridge that same gap in the hopes of remaining direct and dangerous when needed, while also controlling games for longer periods.
[/gpt3]